Ryan McAllister and others use the network mapping methods of Martin Rosvall and Carl T Bergstrom (see previous post) to analyze the research impact of Australian arid lands literature in the paper – McAllister et al. 2009. Research impact within the international arid literature: An Australian perspective based on network theory. Journal of Arid Environments 73(9) 862-871 (doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.03.014).
The figure below show the different research subfields McAllister et al. identified within arid lands research and the citation links among them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1881/b1881286b95e80deba1819a960848f6829f8807f" alt="draft"
Figure 4. Linkages between 21 partitions of the Australian arid literature (based on GN-Mod – see Table 7). Location of authoritative-hub articles (from Table 3): “Animal ecology” contains (Buckley et al., 1987) and (Morton and James, 1988), and Stafford Smith and Morton (1990); “Plant ecology” contains (Ludwig and Tongway, 1995), (Mabbutt and Fanning, 1987), (Montaña, 1992) and (Tongway and Ludwig, 1990), and Tongway et al. (1989); and “Geospatial” contains Pech et al. (1986).