The journal Ecology and Society publishes a lot of work related to resilience and social-ecological systems. As part of a project I am working on, I did a quick network analysis of co-authorship structure among papers in E&S, and based on this preliminary analysis, the papers below are the most typical of Ecological and Society based on authorship*.
- Resilience Management in Social-ecological Systems: a Working Hypothesis for a Participatory Approach Vol 6 Issue: 1:14
- A Handful of Heuristics and Some Propositions for Understanding Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Vol 11 Issue: 1:13
- Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability Vol 15 Issue: 4:20
- Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems Vol 11 Issue: 1:18
- Water RATs (Resilience, Adaptability, and Transformability) in Lake and Wetland Social-Ecological Systems Vol 11 Issue: 1:16
- Drivers, “Slow” Variables, “Fast” Variables, Shocks, and Resilience Vol 17 Issue: 3:30
- Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity Vol 14 Issue: 2:32
- Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Socialecological Systems Vol 9 Issue: 2:5
- Resilience and Vulnerability: Complementary or Conflicting Concepts? Vol 15 Issue: 3:11
- Resilience: Accounting for the Noncomputable Vol 14 Issue: 1:13
- Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Through Comparative Studies and Theory Development: Introduction to the Special Issue Vol 11 Issue: 1:12
- Assessing Future Ecosystem Services: a Case Study of the Northern Highlands Lake District, Wisconsin Vol 7 Issue: 3:1
- Resilience, Adaptability, and Transformability in the Goulburn-Broken Catchment, Australia Vol 14 Issue: 1:12
- Fifteen Weddings and a Funeral: Case Studies and Resilience-based Management Vol 11 Issue: 1:21
- Scenarios for Ecosystem Services: An Overview Vol 11 Issue: 1:29
- Editorial: Special Feature on Scenarios for Ecosystem Services Vol 11 Issue: 2:32
- Resilience and Regime Shifts: Assessing Cascading Effects Vol 11 Issue: 1:20
- Governance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems Vol 11 Issue: 1:19
- Toward a Network Perspective of the Study of Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Vol 11 Issue: 1:15
- Transforming Innovation for Sustainability Vol 17 Issue: 2:11
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the majority of these papers are authored by people from the Resilience Alliance and frequently address resilience and social-ecological networks. However, papers on scenarios, networks, and innovation are also present.
* This is based on a applying eigenvector centrality to the network of papers defined by co-authorship relationships, not content. So, these papers are those that most link together networks of authors.
Following up on my post yesterday on conceptual diagrams of social-ecolgoical systems (SES), below are some more SES conceptual diagrams from the journal Ecology and Society.
I did a google search that found a bunch of nice and not so nice diagrams in Ecology and Societyy, which is the main journal publishing research that uses the term social-ecological system (at least according to ISI’s web of science). Below is a sampling of images, and below that a few examples.
ISI’s new impact factors are out. While there are lots of problems with impact factors, particularly for comparing across fields, they influence where people send their papers and the evaluation of researchers.
So it is good news to see that Ecology and Society‘s impact factor rose substantially in 2010 vs. 2009.
The 2010 impact factor was 3.310 vs. 1.735 in 2009.
However, because E&S publishes relatively few papers a year (92 in 2009, 95 in 2008, 71 in 2007) there is a lot of jumping around from year to year, and at least some of this jumping around is due to ISI undercounting citations to ES due to problems of inconsistency in the citation of electronic journals (no page numbers). However, despite this variation 3.3 is well above the average IF of the previous 4 years of 2.5.
Also, Global Environmental Change, another journal that publishes a substantial amount of resilience research saw its impact factor also rise to 4.918, well above the previous four year average of 3.45.
What’s nice to see also is that this rise in citations isn’t dominated by one highly cited paper, but rather a broad set of quite different cited papers:
The 3 most cited papers from 2008 and 2009 from Ecology and Society were all from 2008:
- The Growing Importance of Social Learning in Water Resources Management and Sustainability Science by Claudia Pahl-Wostl and others.
- Disaster Preparation and Recovery: Lessons from Research on Resilience in Human Development by Ann Masten and Jelena Obradovic, and
- The Roles and Movements of Actors in the Deforestation of Brazilian Amazonia by Phillip Fearnside
and the 3 most cited papers from GEC were from 2009 and 2008 were
- The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought by Dana Cordell and others
- Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning by Derek Armitage and others, and
- Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change by Stephane Hallegatte
I will more broadly look at impact trends in resilience related journals later in the summer.
Ecology and Society has just published a clarifying new paper by Mark S. Reed and others What is Social Learning? (15(4): r1). Reed and his co-authors argue that while social learning is becoming an increasingly important goal in natural resource management there is little consensus on what social learning actually is, and they attempt to provide a clear definition.
They write [formatting added by me]:
Social learning is often conflated with other concepts such as participation and proenvironmental behavior, and there is often little distinction made between individual and wider social learning. Many unsubstantiated claims for social learning exist, and there is frequently confusion between the concept itself and its potential outcomes. This lack of conceptual clarity has limited our capacity to assess whether social learning has occurred, and if so, what kind of learning has taken place, to what extent, between whom, when, and how. This response attempts to provide greater clarity on the conceptual basis for social learning.We argue that to be considered social learning, a process must:
(1) demonstrate that a change in understanding has taken place in the individuals involved;
(2) demonstrate that this change goes beyond the individual and becomes situated within wider social units or communities of practice; and
(3) occur through social interactions and processes between actors within a social network.
A clearer picture of what we mean by social learning could enhance our ability to critically evaluate outcomes and better understand the processes through which social learning occurs. In this way, it may be possible to better facilitate the desired outcomes of social learning processes.