This article might be of interest for all political scientists doing sustainability research. After decades of being dominated by quantitative models and theory-driven research, a panel of prominent scholars at the American Political Science Association (APSA) annual meeting, discussed whether political science at all, was relevant for policy-makers trying to solve real-world problems. The Inside Higher Ed reports:
Gerry Stoker shared “a wicked thought” […]. What if he called as many senior figures in political science as he could reach and asked them “if they had ever said anything relevant in their entire careers”?
[…] Stoker also said that the discipline doesn’t reward relevance. A young scholar is more likely to be promoted for “the novelty of methodological contribution” than for “research that actually has an impact.”
The panel included very interesting interventions from prominent political scientists Sven Steinmo (University of Colorado at Boulder), Bo Rothstein (Göteborg Universty, Sweden) and Elinor Ostrom (Indiana University/Arizona State University). Prof. Bo Rothstein provided an interesting observation:
Rothstein, […], said that maybe the problem to discuss isn’t whether political science is relevant, but whether American political science is relevant.
“If you want to be relevant as a discipline,” he said, “you have to recruit people who want to be relevant.” And in this respect, he said, American political science departments are not doing well.
Read the full article here.
- PhD studentship in Political Science at Stockholm University
- Prof and Phd Environmental Political Science jobs at Lund in Sweden
- Does an increased awareness of catastrophic “tipping points”, really trigger political action?
- Political Ecology and Resilience
- A global assessment of social science understanding of global environmental change