<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Disasters for Systemic Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rs.resalliance.org/2008/05/17/using-disasters-for-systemic-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rs.resalliance.org/2008/05/17/using-disasters-for-systemic-change/</link>
	<description>coping with ecological surprise in a human dominated world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Jones</title>
		<link>http://rs.resalliance.org/2008/05/17/using-disasters-for-systemic-change/comment-page-1/#comment-145694</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rs.resalliance.org/2008/05/17/using-disasters-for-systemic-change/#comment-145694</guid>
		<description>Using disasters or crises for systemic change is an entirely practical proposition and one that the RA should develop the capacity to exploit.  I would suggest that there is nothing to equal the motivational power of a threat to people&#039;s livelihood when it comes to creating change.  Without that threat, its too easy for people to continue with business as usual.  Ruitenbeek and Cartier&#039;s monograph on adaptive co-management includes some evidence from practice that supports this proposition.  The business community commonly use crisis as a basis for &quot;change management&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using disasters or crises for systemic change is an entirely practical proposition and one that the RA should develop the capacity to exploit.  I would suggest that there is nothing to equal the motivational power of a threat to people&#8217;s livelihood when it comes to creating change.  Without that threat, its too easy for people to continue with business as usual.  Ruitenbeek and Cartier&#8217;s monograph on adaptive co-management includes some evidence from practice that supports this proposition.  The business community commonly use crisis as a basis for &#8220;change management&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
