<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kim Stanley Robinson on nature, architecture, and society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rs.resalliance.org/2008/01/04/kim-stanley-robinson-on-nature-architecture-and-society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rs.resalliance.org/2008/01/04/kim-stanley-robinson-on-nature-architecture-and-society/</link>
	<description>coping with ecological suprise in a human dominated world</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Incognito</title>
		<link>http://rs.resalliance.org/2008/01/04/kim-stanley-robinson-on-nature-architecture-and-society/#comment-120575</link>
		<dc:creator>Incognito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rs.resalliance.org/2008/01/04/kim-stanley-robinson-on-nature-architecture-and-society/#comment-120575</guid>
		<description>As great admirer of Kim Robinson as I am, I'd rather "play a powerful god" with my.. cellphone.. than wait another 10-20 millions of years for the natural flow of the evolutionary process to kick in. It is my strong belief that technological and scientific advances, such as the very same Internet, is the only way for humanity to "outsmart" the nature and reach at least some sort of maturity in any foreseeable future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As great admirer of Kim Robinson as I am, I&#8217;d rather &#8220;play a powerful god&#8221; with my.. cellphone.. than wait another 10-20 millions of years for the natural flow of the evolutionary process to kick in. It is my strong belief that technological and scientific advances, such as the very same Internet, is the only way for humanity to &#8220;outsmart&#8221; the nature and reach at least some sort of maturity in any foreseeable future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh S</title>
		<link>http://rs.resalliance.org/2008/01/04/kim-stanley-robinson-on-nature-architecture-and-society/#comment-114791</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rs.resalliance.org/2008/01/04/kim-stanley-robinson-on-nature-architecture-and-society/#comment-114791</guid>
		<description>It's almost haunting how many principles of resilience science emerge in Robinson's statement.  Or in Jane Jacob's work, or David Orr's, etc...

And it seems a straigtforward response to other 'post-modern' themes described by Manaugh, about how society's most 'progressive' or 'modern' elements consider climate change as entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost haunting how many principles of resilience science emerge in Robinson&#8217;s statement.  Or in Jane Jacob&#8217;s work, or David Orr&#8217;s, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>And it seems a straigtforward response to other &#8216;post-modern&#8217; themes described by Manaugh, about how society&#8217;s most &#8216;progressive&#8217; or &#8216;modern&#8217; elements consider climate change as entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
