<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation - update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rs.resalliance.org/2007/09/26/an-update-on-the-scholarly-networks-on-resilience-vulnerability-and-adaptation-within-the-human-dimensions-of-global-environmental-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rs.resalliance.org/2007/09/26/an-update-on-the-scholarly-networks-on-resilience-vulnerability-and-adaptation-within-the-human-dimensions-of-global-environmental-change/</link>
	<description>coping with ecological suprise in a human dominated world</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kevin jones</title>
		<link>http://rs.resalliance.org/2007/09/26/an-update-on-the-scholarly-networks-on-resilience-vulnerability-and-adaptation-within-the-human-dimensions-of-global-environmental-change/#comment-69538</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rs.resalliance.org/2007/09/26/an-update-on-the-scholarly-networks-on-resilience-vulnerability-and-adaptation-within-the-human-dimensions-of-global-environmental-change/#comment-69538</guid>
		<description>It would be nice to layer in which articles were the most cited and overlay it with the productivity of the author networks. Both the direct ven diagram overlaps and the outliers and gaps might be interesting, as well. And then looking at the conclusions of the papers and seeing either new research dollars or new policy dollars going that way; mapping to actual economic influence might be another interesting view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to layer in which articles were the most cited and overlay it with the productivity of the author networks. Both the direct ven diagram overlaps and the outliers and gaps might be interesting, as well. And then looking at the conclusions of the papers and seeing either new research dollars or new policy dollars going that way; mapping to actual economic influence might be another interesting view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
