<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seven Ways to Improve Environmental Education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rs.resalliance.org/2007/04/25/seven-ways-to-improve-environmental-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rs.resalliance.org/2007/04/25/seven-ways-to-improve-environmental-education/</link>
	<description>coping with ecological suprise in a human dominated world</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lee A. Arnold</title>
		<link>http://rs.resalliance.org/2007/04/25/seven-ways-to-improve-environmental-education/#comment-29576</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee A. Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 01:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rs.resalliance.org/2007/04/25/seven-ways-to-improve-environmental-education/#comment-29576</guid>
		<description>Please have a look at these YouTube videos as a possible way to proceed:

http://youtube.com/leearnold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please have a look at these YouTube videos as a possible way to proceed:</p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.com/leearnold" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/leearnold</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biopolitical</title>
		<link>http://rs.resalliance.org/2007/04/25/seven-ways-to-improve-environmental-education/#comment-25747</link>
		<dc:creator>Biopolitical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rs.resalliance.org/2007/04/25/seven-ways-to-improve-environmental-education/#comment-25747</guid>
		<description>So, these guys want to educate children to be less selfish. Sounds familiar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, these guys want to educate children to be less selfish. Sounds familiar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Low</title>
		<link>http://rs.resalliance.org/2007/04/25/seven-ways-to-improve-environmental-education/#comment-25290</link>
		<dc:creator>David Low</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rs.resalliance.org/2007/04/25/seven-ways-to-improve-environmental-education/#comment-25290</guid>
		<description>Thanks for drawing our attention to the article, Gary.  In recommendation one, Blumstein and Saylan argue that, "...the environmental community at large must stop rejecting criticism as negative".  Despite this recommendation, they continue in this theme in recommendation six, saying, "We must teach that conservation-minded legislation may deprive us of some of the goods and services that we previously enjoyed. Self-sacrifice will be necessary to some degree if we are to avoid or minimize adverse effects of imminent environmental threats with truly global consequences." 

Could we perhaps add another recommendation, such as, "The environmental community should embrace positive messages that approach conservation issues, pointing out the positive benefits that will arise out of embracing change".

Applying this, we could re-write recommendation one to read:

"The environmental community at large will find that embracing criticism is a positive thing to do".

The passage from recommendation six might then read:

"We must teach that conservation-minded legislation will provide as with a host of wonderful, life-giving benefits.  Finding new ways to enjoy conservation experiences will lead us out of harms way."

For a more detailed account of the positive functions of dissent, see: http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/index.php/trumpet/article/view/105/109)

David Low</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for drawing our attention to the article, Gary.  In recommendation one, Blumstein and Saylan argue that, &#8220;&#8230;the environmental community at large must stop rejecting criticism as negative&#8221;.  Despite this recommendation, they continue in this theme in recommendation six, saying, &#8220;We must teach that conservation-minded legislation may deprive us of some of the goods and services that we previously enjoyed. Self-sacrifice will be necessary to some degree if we are to avoid or minimize adverse effects of imminent environmental threats with truly global consequences.&#8221; </p>
<p>Could we perhaps add another recommendation, such as, &#8220;The environmental community should embrace positive messages that approach conservation issues, pointing out the positive benefits that will arise out of embracing change&#8221;.</p>
<p>Applying this, we could re-write recommendation one to read:</p>
<p>&#8220;The environmental community at large will find that embracing criticism is a positive thing to do&#8221;.</p>
<p>The passage from recommendation six might then read:</p>
<p>&#8220;We must teach that conservation-minded legislation will provide as with a host of wonderful, life-giving benefits.  Finding new ways to enjoy conservation experiences will lead us out of harms way.&#8221;</p>
<p>For a more detailed account of the positive functions of dissent, see: <a href="http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/index.php/trumpet/article/view/105/109" rel="nofollow">http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/index.php/trumpet/article/view/105/109</a>)</p>
<p>David Low</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
